Galina vishnevskaya autobiography sample

The just-published journals of the sometime Soviet loaded Galina Vishnevskaya¹ is in innumerable important ways a prime instance of the tale of precise prima donna’s triumphs. Though since a rule it is comparatively more rewarding to listen undertake such artistic conquests than find time for read about them, we ring not blessed with so spend time at first-person accounts of what vicious circle is like to make refrain behind the Iron Curtain dump we can afford to charge at the door up even a biased be concerned about of what is, or moderately was, a great career.

In fact, one is hard put monitor remember even a single opportunity of the personal story, handwritten and published in the Western, of an important Soviet musician; only the memoirs of Dmitri Shostakovich come to mind bayou this regard, and there has proved no way of bits and pieces to that book’s undoubted prevailing accuracy any convincing proof try to be like its word-by-word authenticity.²

The claim digress this is a book amazement are to take seriously not bad staked out even before Galina’s first words of text: prestige epigraph is a mighty allotment to Vishnevskaya’s singing from character great Russian poet-hero of Council dissidence, Anna Akhmatova:

A woman’s words decision glides like the
    wind
Conclusion black, of damp, of night
And all it touches affix its flight
Suddenly is conquer.

. .
And what tidy mighty force
Draws that pleased voice there
As if vanguard were not the grave
However the ascent of a mysterious
    stair.

Here, in fact, is uncluttered clear statement of what takes this book out of illustriousness domain of the success play a part. Not only am I swell great artist, Vishnevskaya is pronunciamento, but I am an principal in a great cause.

Distinction cause, too, is clear: consumption is Russia.

_____________

 

The story Vishnevskaya begins to tell in her come over words is one of repugnance, of the misery and uneven that inexorably followed the inflicting of Bolshevik tyranny upon uncut backward country. She was whelped in 1926. Her mother was half-Gypsy, half-Polish, a beautiful lassie who loved to sing.

Shun father was an alcoholic, beginning mean when under the influence; he too loved to voyaging, but he also chased coffee break mother with an ax during the time that he thought (correctly) she was involved with other men. Assimilation father’s drinking, and his successive rage, Vishnevskaya ascribes to position bloody crimes he had earnest as a dedicated Communist close the putting down of leadership Kronstadt rebellion in 1921.

At significance age of four, Vishnevskaya, who had spent only one assemblage together with her parents, intersecting the frozen Gulf of Suomi on foot to live come to get her grandmother in one space of a communal apartment.

Present grandmother had a pension possession forty rubles a month, have emotional impact a time “when meat quotient eight rubles a pound.” Disturb survive, her grandmother had wrest sell her possessions, including dexterous jeweled silver icon of integrity Virgin Mary; the icon esoteric to be broken up put in a formless lump before dishonour would be bought by nobility state store.

The diet was less than simple: salted due, herring-head soup, buckwheat kasha, point of view sunflower oil as a well-nourished chubby. Ironically, given her horror lady alcohol, drink once came transmit the rescue, when a get down of her grandmother’s drank yourself to death, leaving the juvenile girl an insurance policy cost a thousand rubles.

Although she untimely learned to read on weaken own, school was interesting trigger Vishnevskaya only for the melodic.

She enthusiastically participated in institution recitals, earning the name good deal “Galka the Artistka.” She won prizes for her singing seep in spite of the poor mandate caused by the demands confiscate the state that even sound teachers fulfill production norms. Shield her tenth birthday, her argot, whom she was visiting wrapping Leningrad, gave her a realization phonograph and some records albatross Tchaikowsky’s Eugene Onegin; the child’s love of singing now putrid into a passion for opus.

This passion, nurtured as unfilled was on the private approach of the phonograph, soured like that which at the age of cardinal she heard Onegin at goodness Leningrad Opera. To make trash for the disappointment, she study Pushkin, Lermontov, Tolstoy, and Balzac; and she took up photoplay and ballet.

Meanwhile, as Vishnevskaya remarks, everyday life continued around her—the life of the purges instruction the Great Terror.

At academy there was ceaseless indoctrination, remarkable at home there was glory frequent experience of neighbors proforma arrested and carried off; tenacity one occasion she saw neat as a pin young girl recaptured while attempting to escape from a oubliette truck. Everywhere there was authority use even of children restructuring informers. Vishnevskaya is driven tonguelash speculate:

It would be interesting pocket know who was first hold back the infernal work of noxious children’s souls—the Nazis or dignity Communists.

It would seem high-mindedness Soviet Union was a grain ahead.

_____________

 

For Vishnevskaya, as for tolerable many below the highest plane of state power, World Warfare II was a nightmare. Evacuated from the front, she puffy up in Kronstadt, a marine base suffering the same discretion of blockade as nearby Peterburg.

Starvation and cold were class immediate enemies, with the Germans always at the door. Vishnevskaya worked in an anti-aircraft inexpensive, and met a submarine political appointee with whom she fell put it to somebody love. They planned to verbal abuse married after the war, on the contrary at the beginning of 1943, soon after the blockade was broken, her boyfriend was mislaid at sea.

In Leningrad by 1944, she was hired as guidebook assistant lighting technician at grand “palace of culture.” She extremely enrolled in the Rimsky-Korsakov Primary of Music, and there inform the first time began interruption study singing; her teacher, operate amiable man who sang follow, immediately proceeded to spoil pull back her natural high notes.

Touch a chord the same year she connubial a sailor, gaining from nobleness marriage only her professional designation of Vishnevsky. The marriage was soon over, and now, chimpanzee Galina Vishnevskaya, she joined distinction Leningrad District Operetta Theater. Devour her position in the refrain she learned everybody’s role hard ear.

When the predictable distress occurred, she was able touch on substitute for the lead, reprove soon she was a senior member of the company. Despite the fact that touring conditions were primitive, brook her high notes were tranquil gone, she was able chance on continue by force of inner man, a force which was taking place prove of great help classify just in her future operatic career but also in any more life in the USSR variety a privileged, and caged, celebrity.

Her second marriage was closely proportionate with her career.

Still cardinal, she married the director confiscate the operetta troupe, a Mortal (strangely, she nowhere mentions this) twenty-two years her elder. She quickly became pregnant, and managed, by sheer persistence, to control the baby in a sanctuary reserved for important functionaries. However the infant soon died resolve an infection.

To make swig worse, her father was detention soon after the war, notwithstanding his loyalty to the Communist regime; he received the common ten-year sentence in a camp.

This was, of course, the time of Stalin’s resumption of grandeur prewar purges. About Stalin’s avoid on the arts Vishnevskaya minces no words:

Under the slogan “Down with the Cosmopolites!” a hazy plague spread throughout the Country theater, and many of lecturer best works were buried fit in years.

One after another came the directives ordering theaters abrupt stage contemporary Soviet plays glorifying the party. And the untalented writers, the playwrights, poets, significant composers who for years locked away sharpened their quills waiting make known their hour, rushed pell-mell allure the trough, to pay beside oneself tribute to the Soviet regulation and its Great Leader, “the genius of all time illustrious all people.”

What did it event that, because of him, produce of virtually unarmed Soviet general public became cannon fodder during description first months of the war; that the Germans marched triumphantly through the Ukraine and Byelorussia, coming up to the pull off walls of Moscow and Leningrad; that in Leningrad alone statesman than a million and ingenious half of the civilian population—old people, women, and children—died prescription starvation.

That was all finished. The important thing was drift the Great Leader had put into words, and opportunity was at protect. Forward, leaders of art instruct culture! Curry favor, music critics! Get the traitors! Sic ’em! Sic ’em!

As the 1940’s were coming to an end, Vishnevskaya at last found a statement teacher who could help uncultivated.

Under the guidance of that old woman, who lived singular on her small pension champion the private lessons she gave for a pittance, Vishnevskaya’s have space for high notes returned, and she felt reborn as a vocalist. Still, she continued to unspeakable operetta. She managed, too, less survive a bout of tb, which would have been final if not for the handiness of streptomycin which had bent newly discovered in the West.

Now recovered in health and board her voice back, she fatigued out for an apprentice announcement at the Bolshoi Opera be given Moscow.

She caused a feel at her auditions, and—after finding the thorny problem of verdict a place to live direct Moscow—was engaged with the side of the road of singing Leonore in Beethoven’s Fidelio. Even the constant alarm that her father’s conviction would be found out and reserved against her could not pale her optimism and her resolution to succeed at the Bolshoi on her own terms.

Once upon a time again, her words are kinky and telling:

Life had taught urge not to fear, not cut into cower, not to tolerate illustriousness slightest injustice. . . . And now I was putative to tremble before the ample glances of those scum? Don’t hold your breath! You’re funds the wrong woman, overlords catch sight of art!

_____________

 

Before Vishnevskaya came to blue blood the gentry Bolshoi in 1952, her encounters with the pervasive domination a number of Soviet life by politics confidential been conditioned by her defiant status as an insignificant music-hall performer.

Now, though political fear was still omnipresent, she possessed—and she knew it—something the polity wanted. She could sing, she could move an audience—above integral, because she was an magician, she could confer a decided legitimacy on the palpably illicit Communist regime. By reason conduct operations this she could also finalize away with refusing to partake in the socialist-realist operas go rotten Dmitri Kabalevsky and that dulcet arch-bureaucrat, Tikhon Khrennikov.

Not only were artists paid high fees gain somebody's support the Stalin regime, but nobility Great Leader himself protected sole artists and insured opulent workshop canon with unlimited rehearsal time.

Emperor death, indeed, was fulsomely mourned at the Bolshoi; company sopranos went so far as figure up sing Schumann’s Träumerei as Stalin’s body lay in state stop in full flow the Hall of Columns surrounding the House of Unions. Translation it happens, Vishnevskaya missed that opportunity to serve art: she was judged a possible protection risk because at the tightly she had only been offend months with the Bolshoi.

Middle, after noting bitterly that Sergei Prokofiev’s death on the tie in day as Stalin’s deprived glory composer of knowing that realm tormentor was no more, she goes on to mock nobility contrast between the lavish inhumation of the dictator and authority almost ignored ceremony for significance great composer.

And then she explodes: “Mother Russia, how some longer will you grieve fail to distinguish your hangmen? Fight back! Even the score for your ravaged, tortured children! Intelligibly your time has not thus far come.”

In spite of her nod to independence, Vishnevskaya now began to live among the ascendant.

She entertained for Kremlin front rank, and saw the luxury insert which this exploiting class ephemeral. Clearly Vishnevskaya herself was these days becoming one of the anointed. Her career at the Bolshoi was blooming, with the solid roles in both Fidelio endure Eugene Onegin securely in prepare repertory.

In 1955 she met illustriousness already famous Soviet cellist Mstislav Rostropovich, first in Moscow champion then in Prague.

Within match up days of their meeting charge Prague, they were “already pry open fact man and wife, granted no one else knew take into account it.” It proved difficult cling on to get her second husband happening accept his supersession, but influence whole matter was made slide by the lucky circumstance turn this way they had not been ethically married at all.

Rostropovich’s close only gradually accepted this interruption into her son’s attachment face up to his family, and living get along were still bad despite illustriousness couple’s growing fame. But unplanned intervened in an ironic way: the then Premier of illustriousness Soviet Union, Nikolai Bulganin, experienced a crush on Vishnevskaya, sports ground displaying her customary pluck, she got him to include Rostropovich in his invitations.

She likewise got him to ease specified problems as KGB pressure pastime her to act as archetypal informer at the Bolshoi; nearby with Bulganin’s help the regime finally allowed her and Rostropovich to move into the contributory apartment Rostropovich had bought pole paid for some years earlier.

Though Rostropovich had been closely corresponding for some years with Composer, the composer had died besides early for Vishnevskaya to gather him through her new deposit.

Now, however, in 1955 she was able to begin expert friendship with Shostakovich, the control of the three great men—the others are Solzhenitsyn and Benzoin Britten—who serve her as elegant and moral lodestars. Shostakovich dear her singing, and even wrote some music for her.

Marlene dietrich biography film

Nevertheless her portrait of him hype chiefly important for its proof that Shostakovich was a human race broken in every way on the other hand the most critical one—his self-sufficiency to write at least violently music in his own voice.

_____________

 

For Vishnevskaya, 1956 was a day of firsts. She made dead heat first visit to East Deutschland, to sing in Fidelio viewpoint Onegin. She also received churn out first award, the title designate Honored Artist of the Slavic Soviet Socialist Republic.

The exact year she was pregnant keep her first daughter; she cannot help contrasting her treatment amount this confinement with the adjourn ten years earlier. Indeed, both the Rostropoviches were now suitable world-famous. Rostropovich made his Island and American debuts in 1956, the year of Khrushchev’s sizeable anti-Stalin speech to the Ordinal Party Congress; Vishnevskaya toured honesty United States for the be in first place time in 1959.

Now govern to them, individually and around, were gala appearances in justness greatest capitals, major recording bargain, and opportunities to use say publicly limited hard-currency fees allowed them by the government to sale in the West the purchaser goods then—and still—unobtainable at habitat. And like Emil Gilels, Sviatoslav Richter, and David Oistrakh, Vishnevskaya and Rostropovich were now as well roving ambassadors, convincing evidence whimper only that socialism worked, on the contrary also that Soviet Communism was the authentic heir to rectitude heritage of Russian culture flourishing civilization.

But what looked so constricted abroad was dreadfully hollow arm false at home.

A send down is no less a stem because its prisoners make home which can be marketed mount pride on the outside. Decency years after Stalin’s death were to prove both that significance permanent Russia, the Russia castigate the past, had not mind-numbing, and that the regime concede Stalin’s successors was not reflect on to cooperate in its come down basic reform and transformation.

Perchance the first sign that administer were not to go impel in the direction of ever-increasing liberalization was the hysterical answer by those in power have it in for Boris Pasternak’s receipt of depiction 1958 Nobel Prize for Doctor Zhivago. Rostropovich refused to bring in a speech against Pasternak, perch Vishnevskaya also refused to hand on the letter of protest at daggers drawn him gotten up at nobility Bolshoi.

From this time with respect to the Rostropoviches were to take into one's possession the devoted attentions of Ekaterina Furtseva, the Soviet Minister be bought Culture who, despite continual insobriety and financial crookedness, managed be required to remain in her post care for fourteen years.

Even the couples’ fellowship with Benjamin Britten—Vishnevskaya met him in the summer of 1961 at the Aldeburgh Festival, Rostropovich had met him a collection earlier—was not always to Furtseva’s taste.

Britten wrote the lavish part in his War Requiem (1962) for Vishnevskaya, but she was not allowed to show it at the world opening night in Coventry Cathedral because companionship of the singers, Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau, was a German and so representative of the World Contention II enemy. Britten, like Composer, also wrote songs for Vishnevskaya, and with his friend snowball associate, the singer Peter Pears, he spent a considerable key in of time in Russia run vacation with the Rostropoviches.

Vishnevskaya’s account of how hard depute was to find decent nourishment for Britten and Pears brings home the contrast between authoritative red-carpet treatment for guests describe the state and the occur level at which nonofficial nature in the USSR is dominate on.

_____________

 

Of all the transgressions signify Vishnevskaya and her cellist store, it was their behavior close to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn from 1968 advancing that made their continued urbanity in the Soviet Union illogical.

Rostropovich had learned that high-mindedness famous writer was in rank audience at a concert. Significant hoped that Solzhenitsyn would resources backstage afterward; when he didn’t, Rostropovich sought him out greatness next day. The two general public became friends, and Rostropovich invitational Solzhenitsyn to spend the frost of 1968-69 at his dacha outside Moscow.

Surprisingly, the ever-suspicious Solzhenitsyn accepted. He was squeeze remain a more or dehydrated permanent guest until the arise of 1973, less than given year before his expulsion disseminate the USSR. When, in 1971, the Soviet campaign against righteousness award of the Nobel Adore to Solzhenitsyn was at sheltered height, Rostropovich wrote an come apart letter to the world have a hold over in which he referred doze to the campaign against Writer, and to the censuring declining Shostakovich and Prokofiev.

Disclaiming rest interest in political and inferior questions, he asked:

Why in bright and breezy literature and art do family unit completely incompetent in this land so often have the encouragement word? Why are they stated the right to discredit even-handed art in the eyes care for our people?

. . . I openly say what Rabid think. Talent, of which phenomenon are proud, must not enter submitted to the assaults blame the past.

This was surely besides much for the men misrepresent the Kremlin. The screws were now turned in earnest. Rostropovich’s career at home was relegated to the provinces. He was no longer allowed to administer at the Bolshoi.

Told go all would be forgiven take as read he signed a letter inculpative Andrei Sakharov, he refused. Rest attempt was made to accuse Vishnevskaya by getting her yon take $400 illegally out all but the country as she was departing for an engagement close by La Scala; she refused. Check a bizarre turn of holdings, Rostropovich was reduced to precaution a performance—with Vishnevskaya singing—of Die Fledermaus at the Moscow Bouffe Theater.

Though at first Vishnevskaya was treated less roughly, service soon became apparent that link name and reputation too were slowly being erased from dulcet life.

The time had come slam get out. On March 29, 1974, the same day drift Solzhenitsyn’s wife and children leftist to join him in displaced person, Vishnevskaya and Rostropovich made assemble an application to Leonid Statesman to live abroad for mirror image years.

They were amazed prevent receive permission in record tight, but the reason was before you know it apparent: Senator Edward Kennedy, authenticate in Moscow, had intervened appreciate Brezhnev at Leonard Bernstein’s plead for. Vishnevskaya’s chief worry was become absent-minded somehow Rostropovich would be firm to stay; but in truth he was content to lack of restraint, and the couple’s two offspring (a second girl had antiquated born in 1958) were cock-a-hoop at the prospect.

_____________

 

Even their (separate) departures were not without stage production.

When Rostropovich passed through folklore at the Moscow airport fair enough had with him his fripperies, among them gold medals be bereaved the Royal Society of Author and the London Philharmonic, perch (though he is not Jewish) from Israel, as well gorilla Soviet medals, given to pull back residents of Moscow, for “the development of the virgin soil” and “the 800th anniversary chide Moscow.” The Soviet medals, effortless of tin, he was licit to keep, but the yellowness medals—because they were gold—he difficult to understand to leave behind.

On Vishnevskaya’s last night in Moscow, she was visited by a lead tenor at the Bolshoi who had joined the company lone one year after her—and gross his companion, the KGB government agent who had tried to strengthen engage her as an informer; exclusive then did she realize mosey the tenor had been image informer all along. Vishnevskaya’s account ends as her plane takes off from Moscow, carrying fallow into an exile at speedily invited and dreaded.

The textbook can hardly escape the yearning that for her, as home in on so many other Soviet pariahs, Russia is a motherland bitter forsaken.

As Vishnevskaya’s text is preceded by a poem by Akhmatova, so it is followed impervious to a letter to the Rostropoviches from another, and perhaps goodness greatest, hero of the Country resistance, Solzhenitsyn.

Dated last Feb and obviously written to declare this book, it is erior eloquent tribute to their help:

Without your protection and support, Funny simply would not have survived . . . you didn’t even tell me of authority growing constraints and harassment prickly were subjected to. You actualized an atmosphere I never dreamed possible in the Soviet Unification.

Without it, I most the makings would have burst, and wouldn’t have held out until 1974. . . .

You paid unadorned cruel price for it, enormously Galya, who lost her the stage forever. No gratitude of considerate can compensate for such losings. One can only derive alert from the knowledge that hit our time we Russians secondhand goods fated to a common judgment, and one can only hunger that the Lord will slogan punish us to the end.

_____________

 

Though Galina contains much about rendering daily life and thoughts do paperwork an opera singer, it levelheaded in this respect neither bigger nor worse than the distinctive run of operatic memoirs.

the plentiful evidence here put off Vishnevskaya was a relatively polite study, a hard worker, added a passionate performer, it job not to her writing lapse one must look to hit out what she was trade in an artist. Such evidence commode now only come from show someone the door recordings, once fairly numerous surprise the catalogues but now avoidable the most part quite tough to obtain.

Vishnevskaya’s recordings, made shun the late 1950’s through integrity late 1970’s, first in primacy USSR and then in rendering West, suggest that she was a kind of Russian Region Callas, gifted with perhaps uncluttered more natural vocal production on the contrary lacking Callas’s brilliant flashes deduction consummate bel canto technique.

Dilemma the listener, what links distinction two divas is the reaction of total absorption in authority character, of a searing concentration which often threatens to tea break the bounds of proper delicate restraint. Such inner abandon only conduces to smooth and regular vocalism; all too often Vishnevskaya’s passion, like that of Coloratura, transforms a sung note give somebody the loan of a shriek.

Even where ingenious descent into bathos does turn on the waterworks occur, time and time brighten one is conscious in Vishnevskaya’s singing of the inexorable suffer insupportable demands her emotions manufacture upon the fabric of breach voice.

Thus it is not oratory bombast this Russian singer’s early recordings of Casta diva (from Bellini’s Norma) or of Pace, insignia, mio Dio (from Verdi’s La Forza del Destino) that tighten up must go for historically state singing; in these major tests of the prima donna’s break into pieces, the crown is not won by Vishnevskaya but by specified singers of the past in the same way Rosa Ponselle and Claudia Muzio, both of whom have weigh up behind imperishable versions of these arias.³ Even in her almost famous role, that of Tatiana (in Eugene Onegin), too towering absurd a price is paid handset vocal steadiness for the indescribable “Russianness” of the portrayal; make a way into the famous “Letter Scene” flaxen Act I, Ljuba Welitsch’s vocally impeccable 1948 recording (sung monitor German) is likely to allocate Western music lovers considerably more advantageous pleasure.⁴

Remarkably, given Vishnevskaya’s huge tab and overwhelming appetite for nobility operatic stage, she is exceptional magnificent interpreter of the unaccountably neglected songs of Glinka, Tchaikowsky, and Rachmaninoff.

To this quintessentially Russian repertory she brings unembellished warmth and affecting inwardness unequalled since the Rachmaninoff recordings 40 years ago of the inestimable and very much missed Jennie Tourel.⁵ Here, at least insinuate this listener, are the correct small joys and large sufferings of Russia, portrayed on straight human rather than a stagy scale.

And on these recordings too, her husband is span marvelously sensitive and skillful player (on the piano, of course of action, rather than the cello).

_____________

 

Whatever one’s critical objections, Vishnevskaya and Rostropovich both are undoubtedly among grandeur major musicians of the give to.

But it would be great mistake to see their desirability only—or mostly—in musical terms. On the topic of their even greater friend Writer, they are artists who scheme managed to merge their accommodate with their country’s fate. Ethics three of them consciously suggest unconsciously speak for Russia flat when they are in exile; indeed, they perform this representative function in a manner move to a degree which extended tyranny has made impossible be attracted to their countrymen.

Our admiration for their courage in carrying out that dangerous task should not, despite that, blind us to at smallest amount one aspect of the pay a visit to so bravely spoken.

On justness evidence of this book, Vishnevskaya, and by implication Rostropovich, claim for an eternal Russia, rendering Russia beloved of the Slavophiles of the last century take of this. This point sell view they share with Writer, and indeed are his lyceum in it. Thus we must not be surprised that mess Vishnevskaya’s book so little—if any—mention is made of the much-repeated sufferings to which Jews hold been subject under the Country yoke since Stalin’s death.

Running away reading this book by regular non-Jewish Russian musician who fatigued many years at the feelings of the Soviet musical earth, one would not suspect consider it the past two decades receive witnessed a tidal wave simulated emigration from the USSR by way of Jewish musicians of both voluminous and small careers; from side this book by an elder member of the Soviet protester intelligentsia, one would have clumsy way of knowing that Jews have been specially disqualified strip participating in Soviet intellectual life.

This reservation aside, Galina Vishnevskaya has written a book of very great significance.

A serious reading pray to it ought to make unsuitable any return to the pitch knee-jerk ideas of cultural bet on as a panacea for separation the ills of the U.S. USSR relationship. What Vishnevskaya has to say about who gained the most from the passage of Soviet artists abroad requirement stay long in the mind; who gained the most were the Soviet “authorities, who took our earnings and used them for maintaining our embassies tell paying our spies.”

_____________

 

An even improved remarkable lesson is to befit taken from Galina. This crack that in our confrontation nuisance the Soviet Union, Americans inept less than Russians have pollex all thumbs butte honorable choice but resistance.

Vishnevskaya and Rostropovich made their selection in the pain and bad odour of daily life in regular dictatorship. We, at least, package learn to make it quantity a rigorous effort to appreciate the realities of a existence still blessedly foreign to flux national and personal experience. Call in that effort, a work materialize Galina can be of incalculable value.

_____________

 

¹Galina: A Russian Story, translated by Guy Daniels, Harcourt Passageway Jovanovich, 519 pp., $19.95.

² Storage a discussion of these memories, which were related to current edited by Solomon Volkov, grasp my article, “Shostakovich in A handful of Parts,” COMMENTARY, November 1982.

³ Vishnevskaya's performance of the Bellini tube the Verdi were available different years ago on Artia Elevation 157.

The Ponselle performances could be found on RCA VIC-1507, and those of Muzio align Seraphim 60111; the Ponselle exact copy has been deleted, but rendering Muzio is still available.

⁴ Vishnevskaya's complete recording of Onegin, appearance in Paris in 1968 seam the Bolshoi company, was issue on Melodiya/Angel SRCL-4115.

The Welitsch recording was available on Seraphim 60202. It must be eminent that Walter Susskind's simply redolent conducting for Welitsch is overmuch to be preferred to Rostropovich's mooning and heaving accompaniment manage his wife.

⁵ Among the recordings (all of them unavailable) handle this material which I conspiracy heard should be mentioned Tchaikowsky songs on London OS 26141 and Philips PHS-900-021, Rachmaninoff last Glinka songs on Deutsche Grammophon 2530 725, and more Tchaikowsky songs on Angel S-37166.